The Project
Our solution
Specify an appropriate gas investigation and complete a rigorous gas risk assessment using continuous monitoring of gas in boreholes, flux chamber testing and data analytics (used as part of a robust assessment of the historical information, ground investigation and earthworks data by the consultant).
Results
On the basis of a simple screening assessment using Gas Screening Values the site would require gas membranes in the buildings. EPG’s analysis of continuous monitoring and other data including use of the Ambilytics data analytics platform demonstrated that there was no risk of gas emissions to buildings. This removed the need to install gas protection membranes in the development, which provided a significant cost saving. The outcome has also rationalised the requirements for verification gas monitoring in future phases of the development, thus avoiding delays between completion of earthworks and acceptance by regulators.
Challenge
A large former quarry is being developed with a residential led masterplan. Land forming earthworks using original overburden materials have been completed. On the first phase of development elevated carbon dioxide was found in monitoring wells and as a result, gas membranes were installed in the buildings. Using the simplistic Gas Screening Approach the site would have a Gas screening Value of 2.3l/h which would classify the site as Characteristic Situation CS3, with a maximum methane concentration of 44% in deep wells and maximum carbon dioxide concentration of 18%.
The challenge was to demonstrate that the gas in the wells did not represent a risk to the proposed buildings and that it was being generated at a very low rate by widely occurring natural processes and thus could not cause large surface emissions.
Approach
A multiple lines of evidence approach was used to investigate the ground gas risk on the site, including earthworks compliance data (TOC testing). Continuous monitoring in monitoring wells at different depths was completed. A key element of the data obtained is that each reading is linked to weather data from a local station. This allows exploration by the consultant of the relationships between rainfall, atmospheric pressure, wind speed, etc and the gas parameters.
The continuous monitoring data collected by Ambisense GasfluX units and was analysed to provided evidence that the gas in wells was caused by infiltrating rainfall during heavier rainfall events that resulted in biological oxidation of small quantities of organic material that are present in almost all soils. There was no risk of carbon dioxide emissions occurring from the ground and affecting buildings. EPG used the Ambilytics to provide correlation plots, heat maps and 1D partial dependency models. When combined with the other information sets for the site it helped provide multiple lines of evidence, all showing no risk from ground gas.
Methane present in deeper wells was shown to be partitioning from groundwater and was not migrating through the fill material to the ground surface.
Further evidence was provided by correlating gas monitoring in wells with surface emissions tests carried out using flux chambers.
The end result was that EPG demonstrated that the elevated gas concentrations and flow rates in wells were not representative of the actual gas risk. This was approved by the NHBC and the development was able to proceed without the need to fit costly gas protection measures. Thus the monitoring and analysis by EPG paid for itself.
